TeachingEnglish
Legal Conditions - is it grammatically correct?
Submitted by huining on 23 July, 2010 - 05:09
I have received a standard appointment letter from a legal firm, in which I have read this condition:
We will use our reasonable endeavors to communicate with you by whatever means may seem appropriate to us.
Is it grammatically correct? I think it should be:
We will use our reasonable endeavors to communicate with you by whatever means that/which may seem appropriate to us.
PLEASE HELP?
- Login or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version



Hello Huining!
The missing of "that / which" in such structures are not ungrammatical. Some people think (that) it is more rhetorical to omit "that / which" in such cases. However, I do not think so.
Look at the following examples:
1)
- I think that he is very intelligent.
- I think he is very intelligent.
2)
- Some people think that it is more rhetorical to omit "that / which" in such cases.
- Some people think it is more rhetorical...
However I think it is a matter of FORMALITY and INFORMALITY.
For more information follow this link:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/learnitv286.shtml
The word endeavour means 'earnest attempt'
in a sentence like "We will use our reasonable endeavors to communicate with you" the word 'reasonable' is unnecessary.
The sentence could be 'We will endeavor to communicate with you by whatever means that may seem appropriate to us'
It's common legal jargon.
"Reasonable" endeavour means they don't have to try too hard - it is frequently included in terms and conditions.
"that/which" is completely unnecessary, because means= manner/format/style of communication i.e. a noun
so if, for example, you substituted "by whatever letter my seem appropriate to us" you can see that "that/which" would not only be unnecessary, but wrong.