TeachingEnglish
      Constructivism in language learning

      Constructivism in language learning

      It is being discussed in Inda that constructive method is suitable for teaching english as a second language. Is it true to say that children will learn a foriegn language through constuctive approach?


      aryanadsreejith's picture
      aryanadsreejith
      Submitted on 29 August, 2010 - 15:15

       Human beings are genetically endowed with a language system and language acquisition is the unfolding of this innate system. Language acqusition takes place not through imitation but through insightful theory construction.

      Heath's picture
      Heath
      Submitted on 30 August, 2010 - 05:16

      Lewis, with 'The Lexical Approach' pushed for an Observation-Hypothesis-Experiment approach in the late 90s.  It sounds similar, and makes sense to me.

      Anyone know of any experts, research, or good literature on the topic?

      anupkumarr's picture
      anupkumarr
      Submitted on 10 February, 2011 - 00:25

      Heath is very reflective in all his postings.
      Had Heath not written, I would not have  written any thing. And, again at the time of discussion on recent theories on Education, I have come across this term. Let me put it in a nutshell. The concept of constructivism dates back to a very early age when Socrates wrote Dialouges. Later on Jean Piaget and John Dewey propagated this theory when they discussed theories of childhood development. Piaget believed that humans learn through the construction of one logical structure after another, meaning thereby a child has some notions on which s/he builds his knowledge, quite empirically. Dewey said, "If you have doubts about how learning happens, engage in sustained inquiry: study, ponder, consider alternative possibilities, arrive at your belief grounded in evidence. "Inquiry has a pivotal role to play. Lev Vygotsky, Jerome Bruner, David Ausbel are propagators of constructivism. ZPD in language teaching  is well known. ZPD recognises students' innate ability to solve problems going beyond their current level. And it shows they are potentially infinite. As every soul is potentially divine, every ss is potentially powerful, based on their previous experience. They construct new ideas and concepts based on their current knowledge. Think of i+1. There are some basic differences between traditional classroom and constructivst classroom. Differences lie in the following areas Transition from basic skills to whole curriculum to analyse bits .No fixed curriculum is not valued. Learning interactive, Ts have dialogue with ss and the role is one of a negotiator In India NCF 2005 emphasizes this construction of knowledge. Materials are primary souces and authentic. Process is as important as product. Group work peer work are encouraged. But intuitively I think traditional classroom has done us good. That's a different issue and merit discussion.

      Ridha Abdellaoui's picture
      Ridha Abdellaoui
      Submitted on 7 September, 2010 - 05:23

       

      Here are some excerpts from different sources about Constructivism

      1)  "As a philosophy of learning, constructivism can be traced at least to the eighteenth century and the work of the Neapolitan philosopher Giambattista Vico, who held that humans can only clearly understand what they have themselves constructed. Many others worked with these ideas, but the first major contemporaries to develop a clear idea of constructivism as applied to classrooms and childhood development were Jean Piaget and John Dewey..."        For further detailed information follow this link                           

                  http://www.ingilish.com/Constructivism.htm

      2)  " Constructivism is a theory of knowledge (epistemology[1] that argues that humans generate knowledge and meaning from an interaction between their experiences and their ideas (During infancy, it is an interaction between their experiences and their reflexes or behavior-patterns (Piaget called these schemas). .... Constructivism is not a specific pedagogy, although it is often confused withconstructionism, an educational theory developed by Seymour Papert, inspired by constructivist and experiential learning ideas of Jean Piaget. Piaget's theory of constructivist learning has had wide ranging impact on learning theories and teaching methods in educationand is an underlying theme of many education reform movements. Research support for constructivist teaching techniques has been mixed, with some research supporting these techniques and other research contradicting those results. Social constructivism has been criticized for being a kind of behaviorism, which reduces the individual to his or her social environment."   From:

                                     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(learning_theory)

      3) Another simple and easy explanation of  Constructivist Learning Theory (for students...) was presented at the CECA (International Committee of Museum Educators) Conference by  Prof. George E. Hein ,Lesley College. Massachusetts USA,

                      http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/resources/constructivistlearning.html

      4) " Constructivist assumptions about learning could be summarized as “knowledge is actively constructed by learners as they are trying to make sense of their experiences, learners form, elaborate and test candidate mental structures until a satisfactory one emerges (Perkins, 1991), particularly conflicting experiences will cause perturbation in the new structures, so that they can be restructured and constructed anew to make sense of the new information (Piaget 1973; Bruner 1966; Vygotsky 1978). That is, knowledge is not representing and corresponding to the external reality, but is viable (von Glasersfeld 1996). According to Vygotsky learning is a social negotiation of meaning.”   For more clarification follow this link:

                  http://www.ingilish.com/online-learning-constructivism.htm

      5) Here is a constructivist model (instructional framework) that a teacher used in classes:

                                http://www.ingilish.com/constructivist-model.htm

      6) "Constructivism is very much in vogue at the present time. Indeed, constructivism has taken on the force of a slogan in many educational circles – a slogan that, like “student-centered curriculum,” “reflective practice,” and “learning by doing,” has become so commonplace as to inhibit rather than promote clear thinking about teaching and learning. Its popularity has also resulted in something of an intellectual backlash, demonstrated perhaps most clearly in Michael Devitt's assertion that it is “the most dangerous contemporary intellectual tendency” as well as in efforts to link constructivism with other postmodern challenges to science and rationality. "  From:

        http://ajol.info/index.php/jlt/article/view/5984  

       

      Heath's picture
      Heath
      Submitted on 9 September, 2010 - 04:25

      Anupkumarr, Ridha Abdellaoui,

      Thank you both for the helpful titles and websites.  I haven't come across this much in TESOL/ELT and often wish I could combine a bit more from the rest of the world of education.  Very useful, thanks.


      Ridha Abdellaoui's picture
      Ridha Abdellaoui
      Submitted on 9 September, 2010 - 18:10

      You are more than welcome Mr. Heath. I truly appreciate your contributions and the way you present them.

      fairytales39's picture
      fairytales39
      Submitted on 2 October, 2011 - 15:14

      Please help me to find a good topic for my MA thesis. I read about a lot of subjects but ı couldnt decide :(

      jasonoutthere's picture
      jasonoutthere
      Submitted on 13 October, 2011 - 22:19

      We've been doing this for years now and have a complete set of courses that work in traditional classrooms and get learners into social leanring experiences using target language...both face to face and online using social media.

      We have done some audio (before and after) case studies: http://englishoutthere.com/listen

      Let me know what you think?