Dear all,
It's been really nice to be part of this group. Many thanks for all the contributions and ideas :)
I'd like to start a new discussion topic. Do you teach kids aged 8 - 11 years old? Actually, young learners are usually quite noisy, kinaesthetic, demanding and extremely “full of beans”, aren't they? Which techniques/ideas do you use to better manage and deal with this age group?
Looking forward to reading your ideas.
Karla







Comments
Fernando Guarany
Hi Karla,
Great idea starting a thread on Teaching Children. Well done!
I love children, but, admittedly I prefer playing with them rather than teaching them. =) In other words, I'm not a specialist at teaching young learners, even though I have some experience with this age group. Here are some hopefully useful ideas collected over the years (without any theoretical references, I'm afraid):
Lesson Planning - Be spontaneous. Improvise and Adapt!
I'd risk saying that the lesson plan for a younger learners' class will be more effective if teachers leave plenty of leeway for improvisation and adaptation. Anyone who's ever taught children will remember how quickly they can turn your detailedly timed lesson plan upside down. So, by cutting down some on their lesson plans, teachers will be in a better position to think on their feet if (when?) the class starts following an unexpected route. Perhaps one of the key words here would be spontaneity.
Speak only English in class.
A common attitude of teachers is believing that if they speak only English in class, the (young) learners will not be able to understand them. In my experience, that couldn't be further from the truth. Children are capable of developing amazing communication strategies and, in general, are very fast learners. The more teachers address their students in the L2, the more encouraged (and used) they will get to speaking the target language.
Settlers and Stirrers
As you mentioned in your introduction to the topic, children are indeed "full of beans". And when this energy is properly harnessed, the lesson flows harmoniously. Using a variety of settling and stirring activities possibly increases the level of engagement and increases the chances that input will become intake. In practical terms, I usually try and engage young(er) learners with an action song, a mingle or an action game right at the beginning of the lesson. Having released some of their energy, I follow up with a settler, which could be, for instance, a storytelling session with questions and answers or some kind of task with modelling clay or colouring pencils.
Classroom Management - Practise What you Preach
It's been said that a good start saves a lot of time. . . and pain! That's especially true when dealing with young learners. A clearly established class contract (or constitution) may well be the best thing to agree on with the kids on day one. So, whenever a rule is broken (by the learners or the teacher), the group will have a written document to refer to and put things back on track. The modern maxim "practise what you preach" completely comes to life here. Children (much more strongly than adults) do expect teachers to keep their word: it's self-defeating to demand something of your students that you yourself won't comply with. So, if you tell students not to use the L1 in class, don't do it yourself either.
Before closing, here are a few pieces of advice I like giving myself:
To conclude, let me just record that these are just some ideas I can remember off the top of my head. I don't claim authorship and would be thankful to anyone who could indicate any references and sources.
Cheers,
Fernando Guarany
Natal RN Brazil
Crespus
Hi Karla!
Very good thread! As you know, I don't teach kids. I remember we talked about it last year and to be honest I don't think I'm prepared to teach them, yet. Actually, I love teaching adults but I also love new experiences!
BrunoCesar
Hello Karla, Fernando , Crespus and all ,
Firstly, I’d like to thank Karla for bringing such an interesting topic to the fore. I’d also like to congratulate Fernando and Crespus on keeping the ball rolling. ;-)
I myself have mostly been teaching young learners for the last four years. I’m a middle/junior high public sector teacher, and like Fernando, I admit that sometimes I’m much more inclined to play and talk to my students rather than teach them. Young learners are fascinating, a bundle of energy and the owners of brilliant and enquiring minds.
I wholeheartedly agree with the ideas shared by Fernando and I’d like to add a few more of my own based on my own experience. As you may already know, very few public schools have English course books; therefore, I have to constantly photocopy anything I find that may be interesting or useful for the classes I teach (16 classes and in each of them I have somewhere under 40 students):
As to an English-only class, I wonder if there are any public sector teachers out there who can teach a 50 min class speaking only English. I’d love to hear your comments and suggestions on that because I myself can’t do it. Looking forward to reading your comments,
BC
Fernando Guarany
Hi, Bruno and all,
Congratulations on your thorough comment, Bruno. Nice to hear you have hands-on experience with young learners and, what's more, are willing to share it. I understand that teaching English in Public Sector schools with very limited resources is not exactly a walk in the park. However, because of some committed pureblood teachers like yourself, it's still possible to make a difference in education.
I think you're spot on in mentioning technology. It can potentially offer a considerally high level of engagement for young learners. However, most public sector schools in my state cannot afford to even have a cd-player in their classrooms or a functional ICT lab. Of course, teachers could find a way out by assigning techy homework which sts would then do from their homes or "lan-houses." What is the scenario like in this respect in your area?
Concerning your closing question (re English only), I wonder what it is that prevents you from teaching a 50-min lesson speaking only English. Could you give us more details on the issue?
Have a great week!
Fernando Guarany
Natal RN Brazil
karlavitalino
Dear all,
Many thanks for your replies. It seems that both Fernando and Bruno have already had some experience with this age group as well. You should definitely give it a try, Ivan!
I’ve been teaching kids aged 8 – 11 for quite a long time and I can honestly say that although it’s been really demanding, I’m really into teaching them, they are absolutely fascinating!
Young learners are like sponges
You’re absolutely right, Fernando! Young learners are like sponges, they soak up everything we say and how we say it. Thus clear and correct pronunciation is of vital importance, since young learners repeat exactly what they hear. With the help of mixed activities, such as chants, songs, poems and rhymes students’ speaking abilities grow, their pronunciation gets better and their awareness of the language improves. Using songs, poems, rhymes and chants is a wonderful way of making students sing/talk and at the same time (unconsciously) work at their grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation.
Striking a balance
From my experience, we better manage and deal with kids if we strike a balance and alternate silent moments (copying, listening, reading, writing) and noisy/kinaesthetic ones (games, miming, songs, chants etc).
Contract / Limits
You’re right, Fernando, “a clearly established class contract (or constitution) may well be the best thing to agree on with the kids on day one”, especially if they prepare the ‘rules’ by themselves. I’m also inclined to agree with Bruno in relation to setting limits. ‘We may negotiate everything that is done in the classroom, but that doesn’t mean we have lost authority. Like doctors, and any other professionals, we know what we do in our classes.”
Thus, I'm not so sure if I agree with you, Fernando, when you say that “the lesson plan for a younger learners' class will be more effective if teachers leave plenty of leeway for improvisation and adaptation”. Although I agree we should be flexible and adapt according to needs, I believe we should always have a carefully prepared lesson plan. After all, we all have a syllabus and a timetable to follow, don’t we? Maybe, if we consider very young learners, we would have far more room for spontainety, improvisation and adaptation… I might be wrong. So, what do you all think about this issue?
Best wishes,
Karla
PS: I'm a bit short of time right now but I'll be back soon to make some comments on the use of English in class and the use of technology.