This post is a reflection on a previous experience of assessing a project that was relying heavily on creativity.
It was in celebration of the international women's day that we at Al Azhar English Training Center started a poster competition to celebrate it. The competition was to create a poster around a female role model who had an impact on society, which was two weeks before the 8th of March and it was open for all levels.
Teachers took it upon themselves to help students understanding the idea of posters and its usual content. Students brought their own materials to help create their posters.
Then on the 8th of March, we had an opening ceremony to the art gallery where all posters got presented.
The problem was that the two academic managers who were supposed to choose did not have a certain criteria to share neither between themselves nor with the students.
The following dialogue took place between me and another colleague in the process of feedback:
T: What is the criteria you used to choose the winners?
Me: It is the creativity of the poster that makes it standout?
T: But how do you assess creativity?
Me: er, er well, the effort exerted in putting it all together shows it.
T: Still, how do you measure that effort?
Me: ........................................(staring in despair)
One way out of that was to judge the posters by the language used and the academic integrity (plagiarism). Yet, the fact that even this criteria was not shared with students from the beginning. Only to result on having most of the posters ruled out.
- Have a clear aim and share it with your students
- Set expectations for yourself and the students alike
- Design a rubric to serve that aim and share it with the students from the beginning
There of course could be a better view and solution to this situation, I will be glad if you can share with me your thoughts.