My Teaching English blog
eleanor_occena

In this section you can see the latest postings from my personal blog.

TALK
blog 
Function and Competence
I’m back from the course I took in the beautiful city of Puebla de los Angeles, a two-hour drive from Pachuca de Soto where I write this.  The four-day training course I took there was just the beginning of a 100-hour study course that will continue online on a platform up to mid-September.  The  training course was for teachers who will then train the teachers of middle schools in their respective institutions in preparation for the curricular reform in this level that intends to adopt the competence-based approach to teaching.  The objective of the course was made clear to us:  some teachers needed to be trained first in this new teaching approach to be able to train all the other teachers before the curricular change occurs, so that everybody can participate in the ‘change’.

While we studied and analised many of the concepts needed in order to understand what competences meant, I tried to look at these concepts from the perspective of a language teacher.  When on one occasion we were asked if we have had any experience or even just a brush of experience close to teaching competences, I participated by saying that in English language teaching, the idea was there all along.  Language (form) is taught for a certain purpose (function).  Teaching, however, tended to focus on the form, and the function became implicit in the activities that were carried out so that students would ´notice’ or understand what the language is for.  In summary, English teachers are generally concerned with ‘getting the language right’ instead of looking at the learners abilities to show that they can use the language in the right situation or for the right purposes.  This is the reason I say that the intention of teaching to achieve competences was always part of ELT.

 In the competence-based approach to teaching, emphasis is on what learners are able to do after the learning process.  In the case of language learning, the focus is on what learners become competent at when he has learned the language.  So for him or her to become competent at, say, making simple transactions in shops or other services, he needs to learn the language for these transactions.   

So, in ELT, it is a matter of focusing our teaching on what learners need to be able to show at the end of the teaching process: providing them during the learning process with what they need - the knowledge (language structures, vocabulary, idiomatic expressions, formulaic expressions, skills development, etc.) – to gain competence for any language purpose.   Evaluation will focus on looking at evidences of language ability, not on looking at the score of a test that focuses on grammar accuracy, or interpreting a test exercise, e.g., of the past tense forms, as evidences that the student can talk about the past

I would appreciate your thoughts on this.  
Average: 4.1 (19 votes)
Tag

Comments

Submitted on 21 August, 2008 - 00:15

Hello, Ellen!

Thank you for letting us know those details about real places in Mexico:"the beautiful city of Puebla de los Angeles, a two-hour drive from Pachuca de Soto...". This was a cultural note we all certainly appreciate, and might eventually generate some further search/knowledge about your beautiful environment.

As for the "competence-based approach", we agree with you when you made it clear that learners should be provided with "what they need - knowledge (language structures,vocabulary, idiomatic expressions, skills development, etc.) - to gain competence for any language purpose. By the way, you are taking into account throughout the learning process an integrated-skills approach, aren't you?

It has been common to hear comments that more emphasis has been given lately to oral production in detriment of writing. But , when you refer to "language ability", you certainly mean both "receptive" and "productive" skills, I think.

Best regards,

Maria do Céu

Submitted on 21 August, 2008 - 20:00

Hi there again Maria do Cèu! 

Yes, you take into account the skills that you need for the competence.  It may involve just one skill if it refers to, e.g. inquiring about some information that you need (productive skill, either written or spoken), and then another skill (receptive, either listening or reading) to obtain the information.

Competences are based on the needs of your students, so the need to speak or write will depend on what competences need to be developed in your English program.  Most competences though require the development of more than one skill. For example, inquiring in a travel agency about travel packages would require speaking and listening.  Accepting or refusing an invitation can both be developed in writing and in speaking;   There are competences that do not need the other skills i.e. writing a biography or autobiography or giving a presentation or speech (just speaking).

Warm regards,

Ellen

Submitted on 11 September, 2008 - 15:18

Hi,

The end product in any case is communication whatever the form it takes,say,written or oral.What matters most and foremost is the competences i.e intercating, interpreting and producing the learner will acquire and the appropriate resources,namely grammatical structures,lexical items...they will use for a communicative purpose. 

Submitted on 24 September, 2008 - 09:52

 I went throuth your interview and function and competence. they're really wonderful and interesting.  i am also an english teacher and be glad listen and read the experiences from others .  this encourages me to do something which is fruitful for me and others too. when i read competence-based approach to teaching i found it interesting and easy to motivate the students. they will be motivated when they know form as well as function at the same time . i am an english teacher in secondary level. i will be very greatful if you tell some techniques to encourage my students in reading . so they learn more books and develop their knowledge.

Submitted on 25 September, 2008 - 01:52

Hello ganesh1,

Byrne, D., (1988), author of Teaching Writing Skills, wrote:  "In real life...we normally have a reason for writing and we write for somebody.  These are factors which have often been neglected in teaching and practising writing."  I don't have a similar quote on hand for Reading, but I believe it is much the same way.  We read for a purpose most of the time, and those who read for pleasure are those who already enjoy reading.  I also found another quote from Gower, Phillips and Walter (1995), authors of Teaching Practice Handbook, this time about Speaking:  "Communication activities are designed so that students have a reason or a purpose for speaking."  So if we want to encourage our students to read, we can start by giving learners a purpose to read.  We teach Reading because we want to develop reading skills in our students but think that oftentimes  there is no immediate need or purpose to read the text that we give them in the classroom unless we create them.  So one of the most common techniques suggested by authors is to give them something to do before, while and after reading so that they'll read for a reason.  Also bear in mind that in relation to reading for a purpose, students will prefer reading what interests them. The youth, for example read chat and text messages, CD music info, concert and movie posters, product packaging, even comics! I think that they even get to read more nowadays amd learn a lot while surfing the net.

Warm regards!

Ellen

v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} p\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} v\:textbox {display:none;} Diapositiva 16 .O {color:black; font-size:149%;} a:link {color:#660066 !important;} a:active {color:#3694B6 !important;} a:visited {color:#666699 !important;}


 

© British Council, 10 Spring Gardens, London SW1A 2BN, UK         © BBC World Service, Bush House, Strand, London WC2B 4PH, UK