Home
      Reinders, H. and C. White. 2010. ‘The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design’ in English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58-80
      Book editor(s): Harwood, N.
      ISBN: 978-0521121583
      Entered by: Middlesex University (Learner Development Unit)
      Jones, M. and N. Schmitt. 2010. ‘Developing materials for discipline-specific vocabulary and phrases in academic seminars’ in English Language Teaching Materials. New York: Cambridge University Press
      Book editor(s): Harwood, N.
      ISBN: 978-0-521-12158-3
      Entered by: University of Nottingham (School of Education)
      Curry, M.J. and T. Lillis. 2010. ‘Making academic publishing practices visible: designing research-based heuristics to support English-medium text production’ in ELT Materials Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 321-345
      Book editor(s): Harwood, N.
      ISBN: 9780521121583
      Summary: This chapter proposes the use of heuristics for use by academic writers and teachers of academic writing for publication. The heuristics are presented as a type of teaching and thinking tool drawing on research data and findings from a study exploring the experiences of multilingual scholars.
      Country of research: various
      Learners' background: various
      Institutional level: tertiary
      Entered by: The Open University (Faculty of Education and Languages)
      Harwood, N. 2008. ‘Publication outlets and their effect on academic writers' citations.’. Scientometrics 77/2: 253-265
      Country of research: United Kingdom
      Entered by: University of Essex (Department of Language and Linguistics)
      Harwood, N. 2008. ‘Citers' use of citees' names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study’. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59/6: 1007-1011
      Country of research: United Kingdom
      Entered by: University of Essex (Department of Language and Linguistics)
      Angouri, J. and N. Harwood. 2008. ‘This is too formal for us... A case study of variation in the written products of a multinational consortium’. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22/1: 38-64
      Country of research: various
      Entered by: University of Essex (Department of Language and Linguistics)
      Harwood, N. 2007. ‘Political scientists on the functions of personal pronouns in their writing: An interview-based study of "I" and "we"’. Text and Talk 27/1: 27-54
      Country of research: United Kingdom
      Institutional level: tertiary
      Entered by: University of Essex (Department of Language and Linguistics)
      Harwood, N. 2006. ‘(In)appropriate personal pronoun use in political science: A qualitative study and a proposed heuristic for future research’. Written Communication 23/4: 424-450
      Country of research: United Kingdom
      Institutional level: tertiary
      Entered by: University of Essex (Department of Language and Linguistics)
      Harwood, N. 2005. ‘"We do not seem to have a theory...The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap": Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing’. Applied Linguistics 26/3: 343-375
      Institutional level: tertiary
      Entered by: University of Essex (Department of Language and Linguistics)
      Harwood, N. 2005. ‘"Nowhere has anyone attempted…In this article I aim to do just that". A corpus-based study of self-promotional I and WE in academic writing across four disciplines’. Journal of Pragmatics 37/8: 1207-1231
      Institutional level: tertiary
      Entered by: University of Essex (Department of Language and Linguistics)